Landscape




$a$ =

$c$ =

$\leq a \leq$

$\leq c \leq$

id =





Chosen Fixed Point

Here is the data for the chosen fixed point.
$F_{UV}$ represents the flavor symmetries in the UV Lagrangian, and $F_{IR}$ represents the flavor symmetries in the IR. $F_{UV}$ and $F_{IR}$ can differ due to accidental symmetry enhancement.
The number of marginal operators, $n_{marginal}$, minus the dimension of flavor symmetries in IR, $|F_{IR}|$, corresponds to the coefficient of $t^6$ in the superconformal index.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral charge $a$Central charge $c$Ratio $a/c$Matter field: $R$-chargeU(1) part of $F_{UV}$Rank of $F_{UV}$Rational
8200 Sp2adj1nf1 $\phi_1^2X_1$ + $ \phi_1q_1^3q_2$ + $ \phi_1q_2^2$ + $ \phi_1^4X_2$ 0.7632 0.7944 0.9607 [X:[1.75, 1.5], M:[], q:[0.3125, 0.9375], qb:[], phi:[0.125]] [X:[[0], [0]], M:[], q:[[0], [0]], qb:[], phi:[[0]]] 0 {a: 1563/2048, c: 1627/2048, X1: 7/4, X2: 3/2, q1: 5/16, q2: 15/16, phi1: 1/8}
Relevant OperatorsMarginal Operators$n_{marginal}$$-$$|F_{IR}|$Superconformal IndexRefined index
$\phi_1q_1^2$, $ \phi_1^3q_1^2$, $ q_1q_2$, $ \phi_1^2q_1q_2$, $ X_2$, $ X_1$ $\phi_1^6q_1^4$ 1 t^2.25+t^3.+t^3.75+2*t^4.5+t^5.25+t^6.+3*t^6.75+3*t^7.5+t^8.25-t^8.62+t^7.5/y^2-t^8.62/y^2-t^3.38/y-t^4.12/y-t^5.62/y-t^6.38/y-t^7.12/y-(2*t^7.88)/y+t^8.25/y-t^8.62/y-t^3.38*y-t^4.12*y-t^5.62*y-t^6.38*y-t^7.12*y-2*t^7.88*y+t^8.25*y-t^8.62*y+t^7.5*y^2-t^8.62*y^2 t^2.25+t^3.+t^3.75+2*t^4.5+t^5.25+t^6.+3*t^6.75+3*t^7.5+t^8.25-t^8.62+t^7.5/y^2-t^8.62/y^2-t^3.38/y-t^4.12/y-t^5.62/y-t^6.38/y-t^7.12/y-(2*t^7.88)/y+t^8.25/y-t^8.62/y-t^3.38*y-t^4.12*y-t^5.62*y-t^6.38*y-t^7.12*y-2*t^7.88*y+t^8.25*y-t^8.62*y+t^7.5*y^2-t^8.62*y^2


Deformation

Here is the data for the deformed fixed points from the chosen fixed point.

#SuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational
8381 $\phi_1^2X_1$ + $ \phi_1q_1^3q_2$ + $ \phi_1q_2^2$ + $ \phi_1^4X_2$ + $ M_1\phi_1q_1^2$ 0.7441 0.7598 0.9794 [X:[1.75, 1.5], M:[1.25], q:[0.3125, 0.9375], qb:[], phi:[0.125]] t^3.+2*t^3.75+t^4.5-t^3.38/y-t^4.12/y-t^3.38*y-t^4.12*y detail {a: 381/512, c: 389/512, X1: 7/4, X2: 3/2, M1: 5/4, q1: 5/16, q2: 15/16, phi1: 1/8}
8389 $\phi_1^2X_1$ + $ \phi_1q_1^3q_2$ + $ \phi_1q_2^2$ + $ \phi_1^4X_2$ + $ M_1q_1q_2$ 0.7822 0.8291 0.9435 [X:[1.75, 1.5], M:[0.75], q:[0.3125, 0.9375], qb:[], phi:[0.125]] 2*t^2.25+t^3.+4*t^4.5+2*t^5.25-t^3.38/y-t^4.12/y-(2*t^5.62)/y-t^3.38*y-t^4.12*y-2*t^5.62*y detail {a: 801/1024, c: 849/1024, X1: 7/4, X2: 3/2, M1: 3/4, q1: 5/16, q2: 15/16, phi1: 1/8}


Equivalent Fixed Points from Other Seed Theories

Here is a list of equivalent fixed points from other gauge theories.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational


Equivalent Fixed Points from the Same Seed Theory

Below is a list of equivalent fixed points from the same seed theories.

id Theory Superpotential Central Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$ $R$-charges More Info. Rational


Previous Theory

The previous fixed point before deforming to get the chosen fixed point.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational
8184 Sp2adj1nf1 $\phi_1^2X_1$ + $ \phi_1q_1^3q_2$ 1.1587 1.2795 0.9056 [X:[1.6334], M:[], q:[0.4582, 0.4421], qb:[], phi:[0.1833]] t^2.2+t^2.7+t^3.2+t^3.25+t^3.3+t^3.8+t^4.3+t^4.35+2*t^4.4+2*t^4.9+2*t^5.4+t^5.45+t^5.5+t^5.9-t^3.55/y-t^4.65/y-t^5.75/y-t^3.55*y-t^4.65*y-t^5.75*y detail