Landscape




$a$ =

$c$ =

$\leq a \leq$

$\leq c \leq$

id =





Chosen Fixed Point

Here is the data for the chosen fixed point.
$F_{UV}$ represents the flavor symmetries in the UV Lagrangian, and $F_{IR}$ represents the flavor symmetries in the IR. $F_{UV}$ and $F_{IR}$ can differ due to accidental symmetry enhancement.
The number of marginal operators, $n_{marginal}$, minus the dimension of flavor symmetries in IR, $|F_{IR}|$, corresponds to the coefficient of $t^6$ in the superconformal index.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral charge $a$Central charge $c$Ratio $a/c$Matter field: $R$-chargeU(1) part of $F_{UV}$Rank of $F_{UV}$Rational
46299 SU2adj1nf2 $\phi_1q_1q_2$ + $ M_1\tilde{q}_1\tilde{q}_2$ + $ \phi_1^2X_1$ + $ \phi_1\tilde{q}_2^2$ + $ M_2q_2\tilde{q}_1$ + $ M_1M_2$ + $ M_2\phi_1\tilde{q}_1^2$ 0.4029 0.4654 0.8657 [X:[1.4286], M:[0.8571, 1.1429], q:[1.1429, 0.5714], qb:[0.2857, 0.8571], phi:[0.2857]] [X:[[0]], M:[[0], [0]], q:[[0], [0]], qb:[[0], [0]], phi:[[0]]] 0 {a: 2211/5488, c: 1277/2744, X1: 10/7, M1: 6/7, M2: 8/7, q1: 8/7, q2: 4/7, qb1: 2/7, qb2: 6/7, phi1: 2/7}
Relevant OperatorsMarginal Operators$n_{marginal}$$-$$|F_{IR}|$Superconformal IndexRefined index
$M_1$, $ \phi_1\tilde{q}_1^2$, $ M_2$, $ q_1\tilde{q}_1$, $ q_2\tilde{q}_2$, $ \phi_1\tilde{q}_1\tilde{q}_2$, $ X_1$, $ M_1^2$, $ q_1q_2$, $ \phi_1^2\tilde{q}_1^4$ $q_1\tilde{q}_2$ -1 2*t^2.57 + t^3.43 + 2*t^4.29 + 2*t^5.14 - t^6. + t^6.86 + 2*t^7.71 - t^3.86/y + t^8.14/y - t^3.86*y + t^8.14*y 2*t^2.57 + t^3.43 + 2*t^4.29 + 2*t^5.14 - t^6. + t^6.86 + 2*t^7.71 - t^3.86/y + t^8.14/y - t^3.86*y + t^8.14*y


Deformation

Here is the data for the deformed fixed points from the chosen fixed point.

#SuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational
46746 $\phi_1q_1q_2$ + $ M_1\tilde{q}_1\tilde{q}_2$ + $ \phi_1^2X_1$ + $ \phi_1\tilde{q}_2^2$ + $ M_2q_2\tilde{q}_1$ + $ M_1M_2$ + $ M_2\phi_1\tilde{q}_1^2$ + $ M_2M_3$ 0.4155 0.4869 0.8533 [X:[1.4286], M:[0.8571, 1.1429, 0.8571], q:[1.1429, 0.5714], qb:[0.2857, 0.8571], phi:[0.2857]] 3*t^2.57 + 2*t^4.29 + 5*t^5.14 - 3*t^6. - t^3.86/y - t^3.86*y detail {a: 285/686, c: 167/343, X1: 10/7, M1: 6/7, M2: 8/7, M3: 6/7, q1: 8/7, q2: 4/7, qb1: 2/7, qb2: 6/7, phi1: 2/7}


Equivalent Fixed Points from Other Seed Theories

Here is a list of equivalent fixed points from other gauge theories.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational
28 SU2adj1nf1 $\phi_1^2X_1$ + $ M_1\phi_1q_1^2$ + $ M_2\phi_1q_1\tilde{q}_1$ + $ M_1M_2$ + $ M_1q_1\tilde{q}_1$ 0.4029 0.4654 0.8657 [X:[1.4286], M:[1.1429, 0.8571], q:[0.2857], qb:[0.5714], phi:[0.2857]] 2*t^2.57 + t^3.43 + 2*t^4.29 + 2*t^5.14 - t^6. - t^3.86/y - t^3.86*y detail {a: 2211/5488, c: 1277/2744, X1: 10/7, M1: 8/7, M2: 6/7, q1: 2/7, qb1: 4/7, phi1: 2/7}


Equivalent Fixed Points from the Same Seed Theory

Below is a list of equivalent fixed points from the same seed theories.

id Theory Superpotential Central Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$ $R$-charges More Info. Rational


Previous Theory

The previous fixed point before deforming to get the chosen fixed point.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational
46058 SU2adj1nf2 $\phi_1q_1q_2$ + $ M_1\tilde{q}_1\tilde{q}_2$ + $ \phi_1^2X_1$ + $ \phi_1\tilde{q}_2^2$ + $ M_2q_2\tilde{q}_1$ + $ M_1M_2$ 0.4135 0.4854 0.8518 [X:[1.3853], M:[0.922, 1.078], q:[1.0024, 0.6903], qb:[0.2317, 0.8463], phi:[0.3073]] t^2.31 + t^2.77 + t^3.23 + t^3.7 + t^4.16 + t^4.62 + t^5.08 + t^5.55 - t^6. - t^3.92/y - t^3.92*y detail