Landscape




$a$ =

$c$ =

$\leq a \leq$

$\leq c \leq$

id =





Chosen Fixed Point

Here is the data for the chosen fixed point.
$F_{UV}$ represents the flavor symmetries in the UV Lagrangian, and $F_{IR}$ represents the flavor symmetries in the IR. $F_{UV}$ and $F_{IR}$ can differ due to accidental symmetry enhancement.
The number of marginal operators, $n_{marginal}$, minus the dimension of flavor symmetries in IR, $|F_{IR}|$, corresponds to the coefficient of $t^6$ in the superconformal index.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral charge $a$Central charge $c$Ratio $a/c$Matter field: $R$-chargeU(1) part of $F_{UV}$Rank of $F_{UV}$Rational
45844 SU2adj1nf2 ${}\phi_{1}q_{1}q_{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{1}$ 0.6281 0.758 0.8286 [M:[0.6967], q:[0.8158, 0.8292], qb:[0.4741, 0.4607], phi:[0.3551]] [M:[[-5, 1]], q:[[-1, 2], [2, -1]], qb:[[3, 0], [0, 3]], phi:[[-1, -1]]] 2
Relevant OperatorsMarginal Operators$n_{marginal}$$-$$|F_{IR}|$Superconformal IndexRefined index
${}M_{1}$, ${ }\phi_{1}^{2}$, ${ }\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }q_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}^{2}$, ${ }q_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}$, ${ }q_{2}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }q_{2}\tilde{q}_{1}$, ${ }M_{1}^{2}$, ${ }M_{1}\phi_{1}^{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}^{4}$, ${ }M_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }q_{1}q_{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}^{2}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }\tilde{q}_{1}^{2}\tilde{q}_{2}^{2}$, ${ }M_{1}q_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }M_{1}\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}^{2}$, ${ }M_{1}q_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}$, ${ }M_{1}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}^{3}\tilde{q}_{2}^{2}$ ${}\phi_{1}^{3}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$ -1 t^2.09 + t^2.13 + t^2.805 + 2*t^3.829 + 3*t^3.87 + t^3.91 + t^4.18 + t^4.22 + t^4.261 + t^4.895 + 2*t^4.935 + t^5.609 + 2*t^5.919 + 3*t^5.96 - t^6. - t^6.04 + t^6.27 + t^6.31 + t^6.351 + t^6.391 + 2*t^6.634 + 3*t^6.674 + t^6.715 + t^6.984 - 2*t^7.065 - 2*t^7.105 + 3*t^7.659 + 5*t^7.699 + 5*t^7.739 + t^7.78 + t^7.82 + 2*t^8.009 + 3*t^8.05 - t^8.09 - 2*t^8.13 - t^8.171 + t^8.36 + t^8.4 + t^8.414 + t^8.441 + t^8.481 + t^8.521 + 2*t^8.724 + 3*t^8.764 - 2*t^8.805 - 2*t^8.845 - t^4.065/y - t^6.155/y - t^6.195/y + t^7.22/y + t^7.895/y + (2*t^7.935)/y + t^7.975/y - t^8.245/y - t^8.285/y - t^8.326/y + (2*t^8.919)/y + (5*t^8.96)/y - t^4.065*y - t^6.155*y - t^6.195*y + t^7.22*y + t^7.895*y + 2*t^7.935*y + t^7.975*y - t^8.245*y - t^8.285*y - t^8.326*y + 2*t^8.919*y + 5*t^8.96*y (g2*t^2.09)/g1^5 + t^2.13/(g1^2*g2^2) + g1^3*g2^3*t^2.805 + (2*g2^5*t^3.829)/g1 + 3*g1^2*g2^2*t^3.87 + (g1^5*t^3.91)/g2 + (g2^2*t^4.18)/g1^10 + t^4.22/(g1^7*g2) + t^4.261/(g1^4*g2^4) + (g2^4*t^4.895)/g1^2 + 2*g1*g2*t^4.935 + g1^6*g2^6*t^5.609 + (2*g2^6*t^5.919)/g1^6 + (3*g2^3*t^5.96)/g1^3 - t^6. - (g1^3*t^6.04)/g2^3 + (g2^3*t^6.27)/g1^15 + t^6.31/g1^12 + t^6.351/(g1^9*g2^3) + t^6.391/(g1^6*g2^6) + 2*g1^2*g2^8*t^6.634 + 3*g1^5*g2^5*t^6.674 + g1^8*g2^2*t^6.715 + (g2^5*t^6.984)/g1^7 - (2*t^7.065)/(g1*g2) - (2*g1^2*t^7.105)/g2^4 + (3*g2^10*t^7.659)/g1^2 + 5*g1*g2^7*t^7.699 + 5*g1^4*g2^4*t^7.739 + g1^7*g2*t^7.78 + (g1^10*t^7.82)/g2^2 + (2*g2^7*t^8.009)/g1^11 + (3*g2^4*t^8.05)/g1^8 - (g2*t^8.09)/g1^5 - (2*t^8.13)/(g1^2*g2^2) - (g1*t^8.171)/g2^5 + (g2^4*t^8.36)/g1^20 + (g2*t^8.4)/g1^17 + g1^9*g2^9*t^8.414 + t^8.441/(g1^14*g2^2) + t^8.481/(g1^11*g2^5) + t^8.521/(g1^8*g2^8) + (2*g2^9*t^8.724)/g1^3 + 3*g2^6*t^8.764 - 2*g1^3*g2^3*t^8.805 - 2*g1^6*t^8.845 - t^4.065/(g1*g2*y) - t^6.155/(g1^6*y) - t^6.195/(g1^3*g2^3*y) + t^7.22/(g1^7*g2*y) + (g2^4*t^7.895)/(g1^2*y) + (2*g1*g2*t^7.935)/y + (g1^4*t^7.975)/(g2^2*y) - (g2*t^8.245)/(g1^11*y) - t^8.285/(g1^8*g2^2*y) - t^8.326/(g1^5*g2^5*y) + (2*g2^6*t^8.919)/(g1^6*y) + (5*g2^3*t^8.96)/(g1^3*y) - (t^4.065*y)/(g1*g2) - (t^6.155*y)/g1^6 - (t^6.195*y)/(g1^3*g2^3) + (t^7.22*y)/(g1^7*g2) + (g2^4*t^7.895*y)/g1^2 + 2*g1*g2*t^7.935*y + (g1^4*t^7.975*y)/g2^2 - (g2*t^8.245*y)/g1^11 - (t^8.285*y)/(g1^8*g2^2) - (t^8.326*y)/(g1^5*g2^5) + (2*g2^6*t^8.919*y)/g1^6 + (5*g2^3*t^8.96*y)/g1^3


Deformation

Here is the data for the deformed fixed points from the chosen fixed point.

#SuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational
45937 ${}\phi_{1}q_{1}q_{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{1}$ + ${ }M_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$ + ${ }\phi_{1}^{2}X_{1}$ 0.5336 0.6056 0.881 [X:[1.4237], M:[0.8645], q:[1.0, 0.7118], qb:[0.4237, 0.7118], phi:[0.2882]] t^2.593 + 2*t^3.407 + 4*t^4.271 + t^5.136 + t^5.187 - 5*t^6. - t^3.864/y - t^3.864*y detail
45935 ${}\phi_{1}q_{1}q_{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{1}$ + ${ }M_{2}\phi_{1}^{2}$ 0.6078 0.721 0.843 [M:[0.7025, 1.2818], q:[0.8126, 0.8283], qb:[0.4692, 0.4535], phi:[0.3591]] t^2.107 + t^2.768 + 2*t^3.798 + 4*t^3.845 + t^3.893 + t^4.215 + t^4.875 + t^4.923 + t^5.536 + 2*t^5.906 + 2*t^5.953 - 4*t^6. - t^4.077/y - t^4.077*y detail


Equivalent Fixed Points from Other Seed Theories

Here is a list of equivalent fixed points from other gauge theories.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational


Equivalent Fixed Points from the Same Seed Theory

Below is a list of equivalent fixed points from the same seed theories.

id Theory Superpotential Central Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$ $R$-charges More Info. Rational


Previous Theory

The previous fixed point before deforming to get the chosen fixed point.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational
45833 SU2adj1nf2 ${}\phi_{1}q_{1}q_{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}^{2}$ 0.6281 0.7582 0.8284 [M:[0.6941], q:[0.8224, 0.8224], qb:[0.4753, 0.4589], phi:[0.3553]] t^2.082 + t^2.132 + t^2.803 + t^3.819 + 2*t^3.844 + t^3.868 + 2*t^3.893 + t^4.165 + t^4.214 + t^4.263 + t^4.885 + 2*t^4.934 + t^5.605 + t^5.901 + 2*t^5.926 + t^5.951 + 2*t^5.975 - 2*t^6. - t^4.066/y - t^4.066*y detail