Landscape




$a$ =

$c$ =

$\leq a \leq$

$\leq c \leq$

id =





Chosen Fixed Point

Here is the data for the chosen fixed point.
$F_{UV}$ represents the flavor symmetries in the UV Lagrangian, and $F_{IR}$ represents the flavor symmetries in the IR. $F_{UV}$ and $F_{IR}$ can differ due to accidental symmetry enhancement.
The number of marginal operators, $n_{marginal}$, minus the dimension of flavor symmetries in IR, $|F_{IR}|$, corresponds to the coefficient of $t^6$ in the superconformal index.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral charge $a$Central charge $c$Ratio $a/c$Matter field: $R$-chargeU(1) part of $F_{UV}$Rank of $F_{UV}$Rational
3244 SU2adj1nf2 ${}M_{1}q_{1}q_{2}$ + ${ }M_{2}\phi_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{3}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$ + ${ }\phi_{1}q_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{4}q_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}$ + ${ }M_{4}\phi_{1}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{2}$ + ${ }M_{4}M_{5}$ 0.589 0.742 0.7938 [M:[1.0, 1.0346, 0.9307, 0.724, 1.276], q:[0.7587, 0.2413], qb:[0.5173, 0.552], phi:[0.4827]] [M:[[0], [4], [-8], [-3], [3]], q:[[1], [-1]], qb:[[2], [6]], phi:[[-2]]] 1
Relevant OperatorsMarginal Operators$n_{marginal}$$-$$|F_{IR}|$Superconformal IndexRefined index
${}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{1}$, ${ }q_{2}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }M_{3}$, ${ }\phi_{1}q_{2}^{2}$, ${ }M_{1}$, ${ }M_{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{1}$, ${ }M_{5}$, ${ }\phi_{1}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }q_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}^{2}$, ${ }q_{2}^{2}\tilde{q}_{1}^{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }q_{2}^{2}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}^{2}$, ${ }q_{2}^{2}\tilde{q}_{2}^{2}$, ${ }\phi_{1}q_{2}^{3}\tilde{q}_{1}$, ${ }\phi_{1}q_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}$, ${ }\phi_{1}q_{2}^{3}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }M_{2}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{1}$, ${ }\phi_{1}q_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }M_{2}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{2}$, ${ }M_{3}^{2}$, ${ }M_{3}\phi_{1}q_{2}^{2}$, ${ }M_{1}M_{3}$, ${ }\phi_{1}^{2}q_{2}^{4}$ ${}\phi_{1}q_{2}^{2}\tilde{q}_{1}^{2}$ -1 t^2.276 + t^2.38 + t^2.792 + t^2.896 + t^3. + t^3.104 + t^3.724 + 2*t^3.828 + t^3.932 + 2*t^4.552 + 2*t^4.656 + 2*t^4.76 + t^5.172 + 2*t^5.276 + 2*t^5.38 + t^5.484 + t^5.584 + t^5.688 + 2*t^5.792 - t^6. + 2*t^6.104 + 3*t^6.208 + t^6.312 + t^6.62 + t^6.724 + 2*t^6.828 + 3*t^6.932 + 3*t^7.036 + 2*t^7.14 + 2*t^7.552 + 6*t^7.656 + 4*t^7.76 + 2*t^7.864 + t^8.068 - 2*t^8.276 + t^8.376 + t^8.48 + 4*t^8.484 + 2*t^8.584 + 5*t^8.588 + 2*t^8.688 + 2*t^8.692 - 2*t^8.792 - 3*t^8.896 - t^4.448/y - t^7.24/y + (2*t^7.656)/y + t^8.068/y + (2*t^8.172)/y + (2*t^8.276)/y + (2*t^8.38)/y + t^8.484/y + t^8.688/y + t^8.792/y + (2*t^8.896)/y - t^4.448*y - t^7.24*y + 2*t^7.656*y + t^8.068*y + 2*t^8.172*y + 2*t^8.276*y + 2*t^8.38*y + t^8.484*y + t^8.688*y + t^8.792*y + 2*t^8.896*y g1*t^2.276 + g1^5*t^2.38 + t^2.792/g1^8 + t^2.896/g1^4 + t^3. + g1^4*t^3.104 + t^3.724/g1 + 2*g1^3*t^3.828 + g1^7*t^3.932 + 2*g1^2*t^4.552 + 2*g1^6*t^4.656 + 2*g1^10*t^4.76 + t^5.172/g1^3 + 2*g1*t^5.276 + 2*g1^5*t^5.38 + g1^9*t^5.484 + t^5.584/g1^16 + t^5.688/g1^12 + (2*t^5.792)/g1^8 - t^6. + 2*g1^4*t^6.104 + 3*g1^8*t^6.208 + g1^12*t^6.312 + t^6.62/g1^5 + t^6.724/g1 + 2*g1^3*t^6.828 + 3*g1^7*t^6.932 + 3*g1^11*t^7.036 + 2*g1^15*t^7.14 + 2*g1^2*t^7.552 + 6*g1^6*t^7.656 + 4*g1^10*t^7.76 + 2*g1^14*t^7.864 + t^8.068/g1^7 - 2*g1*t^8.276 + t^8.376/g1^24 + t^8.48/g1^20 + 4*g1^9*t^8.484 + (2*t^8.584)/g1^16 + 5*g1^13*t^8.588 + (2*t^8.688)/g1^12 + 2*g1^17*t^8.692 - (2*t^8.792)/g1^8 - (3*t^8.896)/g1^4 - t^4.448/(g1^2*y) - t^7.24/(g1^10*y) + (2*g1^6*t^7.656)/y + t^8.068/(g1^7*y) + (2*t^8.172)/(g1^3*y) + (2*g1*t^8.276)/y + (2*g1^5*t^8.38)/y + (g1^9*t^8.484)/y + t^8.688/(g1^12*y) + t^8.792/(g1^8*y) + (2*t^8.896)/(g1^4*y) - (t^4.448*y)/g1^2 - (t^7.24*y)/g1^10 + 2*g1^6*t^7.656*y + (t^8.068*y)/g1^7 + (2*t^8.172*y)/g1^3 + 2*g1*t^8.276*y + 2*g1^5*t^8.38*y + g1^9*t^8.484*y + (t^8.688*y)/g1^12 + (t^8.792*y)/g1^8 + (2*t^8.896*y)/g1^4


Deformation

Here is the data for the deformed fixed points from the chosen fixed point.

#SuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational
3665 ${}M_{1}q_{1}q_{2}$ + ${ }M_{2}\phi_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{3}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$ + ${ }\phi_{1}q_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{4}q_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}$ + ${ }M_{4}\phi_{1}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{2}$ + ${ }M_{4}M_{5}$ + ${ }M_{6}q_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$ 0.6097 0.7822 0.7795 [M:[1.0, 1.0379, 0.9243, 0.7216, 1.2784, 0.6837], q:[0.7595, 0.2405], qb:[0.5189, 0.5568], phi:[0.4811]] t^2.051 + t^2.278 + t^2.392 + t^2.773 + t^2.886 + t^3. + t^3.114 + t^3.722 + 2*t^3.835 + t^4.102 + t^4.33 + t^4.443 + 2*t^4.557 + 2*t^4.67 + 2*t^4.784 + t^4.824 + t^4.938 + t^5.051 + 2*t^5.165 + 2*t^5.278 + 2*t^5.392 + t^5.506 + t^5.546 + t^5.659 + 3*t^5.773 + 2*t^5.886 - t^6. - t^4.443/y - t^4.443*y detail


Equivalent Fixed Points from Other Seed Theories

Here is a list of equivalent fixed points from other gauge theories.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational


Equivalent Fixed Points from the Same Seed Theory

Below is a list of equivalent fixed points from the same seed theories.

id Theory Superpotential Central Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$ $R$-charges More Info. Rational


Previous Theory

The previous fixed point before deforming to get the chosen fixed point.

#TheorySuperpotentialCentral Charge $a$ Central Charge $c$ Ratio $a/c$$R$-chargesSuperconformal IndexMore Info.Rational
2734 SU2adj1nf2 ${}M_{1}q_{1}q_{2}$ + ${ }M_{2}\phi_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{3}\tilde{q}_{1}\tilde{q}_{2}$ + ${ }\phi_{1}q_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{1}^{2}$ + ${ }M_{4}q_{1}\tilde{q}_{1}$ + ${ }M_{4}\phi_{1}q_{2}\tilde{q}_{2}$ 0.609 0.779 0.7817 [M:[1.0, 1.0388, 0.9224, 0.7209], q:[0.7597, 0.2403], qb:[0.5194, 0.5582], phi:[0.4806]] t^2.163 + t^2.279 + t^2.395 + t^2.767 + t^2.884 + t^3. + t^3.116 + t^3.721 + t^3.837 + t^3.954 + t^4.325 + t^4.442 + 3*t^4.558 + 2*t^4.675 + 2*t^4.791 + t^4.93 + t^5.046 + 2*t^5.163 + 3*t^5.279 + 2*t^5.395 + t^5.512 + t^5.535 + t^5.651 + 2*t^5.767 + t^5.884 - t^4.442/y - t^4.442*y detail